Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and a first venous or arterial thrombotic event: clinical characteristics, antibody profiles and estimate of the risk of recurrence.

OBJECTIVES: Thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) involves in most cases the venous circulation. Why in some patients thrombotic APS affects the arterial circulation and in particular cerebral circulation is unknown. In previous studies, both patient characteristics and antiphospholipid antibody types and titers have been associated with arterial thrombosis. Aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of venous and arterial thrombotic APS from a large series of patients. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Start 2 antiphospholipid, a multicenter prospective register of long-term collected data from Thrombosis Centers in Italy. RESULTS: Of 167 patients with thrombotic APS, 114 (68 %) had a venous and 53 (32 %) had an arterial event as first clinical manifestation. Several clinical characteristics and risk factors were different among groups in univariate analysis. Using logistic regression analysis, reduced creatinine clearance and hyperlipidemia were independent variable for the occurrence of arterial APS. Notably, no difference in antiphospholipid antibody profiles and aß2-Glycoprotein I levels were found between groups. A higher adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) was found in arterial group indicating a possible high recurrence rate in arterial APS. CONCLUSIONS: These data have pathophysiological and clinical implication since associated conditions might predispose patients to arterial rather than venous events and call to a close monitoring and treatment of arterial APS due to their increased tendency to recurrence.

Close link between antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, and activated protein C resistance in tetra antiphospholipid antibody-positive subjects.

BACKGROUND: Most of the carriers/patients triple-positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LAC], immunoglobulin G [IgG]/immunoglobulin M [IgM] anticardiolipin, and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibodies) are tetra-positive, being positive for antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies. The relationship between aPS/PT titer, LAC potency, and resistance to activated protein C (aPC-R) has not been investigated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to clarify the mutual interdependence of these parameters in tetra-positive subjects. METHODS: Twenty-three carriers and 30 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, none of whom were being treated with anticoagulants, and 30 age- and sex-matched controls were studied. Detection of aPS/PT, LAC, and aPC-R in each individual was performed with established methods in our laboratory. Carriers and patients were positive for IgG or IgM aPS/PT or for both isotypes without significant difference. Since both IgG and IgM aPS/PT have anticoagulant activity, we used the sum of their titers (total aPS/PT) for the correlation studies. RESULTS: Total aPS/PT in all individuals studied exceeded that in controls. There was no difference in total aPS/PT titers (P = .72), LAC potency (P = .56), and aPC-R (P = .82) between antiphospholipid antibody-carriers and patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. There was a significant correlation between total aPS/PT and LAC potency (r = 0.78; P < .0001) and between total aPS/PT titers and aPC-R (r = 0.80; P < .0001). LAC potency also was correlated significantly with aPC-R (r = 0.72; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: This study shows that there is interdependence between aPS/PT, LAC potency, and aPC-R.

New pharmacotherapeutic options for oral anticoagulant treatment in atrial fibrillation patients aged 65 and older: factor XIa inhibitors and beyond.

INTRODUCTION: Although much progress has been made using anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, bleeding is still a major concern. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews current pharmacotherapeutic options in this setting. Particular emphasis is placed on the ability of the new molecules to minimize the bleeding risk in elderly patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2023 was carried out. EXPERT OPINION: Contact phase of coagulation is a possible new target for anticoagulant therapy. Indeed, congenital or acquired deficiency of contact phase factors is associated with reduced thrombotic burden and limited risk of spontaneous bleeding. These new drugs seem particularly suitable for stroke prevention in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in whom the hemorrhagic risk is high. Most of anti Factor XI (FXI) drugs are for parenteral use only. A group of small molecules are for oral use and therefore are candidates to substitute direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Doubts remain on the possibility of impaired hemostasis. Indeed, a fine calibration of inhibition of contact phase factors is crucial for an effective and safe treatment.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Acquired thrombophilia and in particular the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) may play an important role in the development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Young patients suffering from an episode of unprovoked pulmonary embolism (PE), or PE provoked by mild risk factors, should be tested for aPL. In case of a positive result, they should be closely followed up and lifelong anticoagulant treatment should be considered. Indeed, aPL-induced thrombophilia may favor PE recurrence with the consequence of possible CTEPH development. The aPL profiles play an important role in this pathway. Patients with PE and triple positivity (lupus anticoagulant, LAC, anti-cardiolipin, aCL, and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I, aß2GPI) are at the highest risk of recurrence and deserve maximum protection by anticoagulant treatment with warfarin.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.

Unprovoked (or provoked by mild risk factors) venous thromboembolism (VTE) in young patients, VTE in uncommon sites, or cases of unexplained VTE recurrence may be positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and thus may be diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The evaluation of aPL is standardized using immunological tests for anticardiolipin and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I. The determination of functional antibodies (lupus anticoagulant) is less standardized, especially in patients on anticoagulant treatment. Patients positive for all the three tests are at high risk of recurrence, which, in turn, might lead to chronic obstruction of pulmonary vessels (chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension). Randomized clinical trials have shown that triple-positive patients should be treated with vitamin K antagonists maintaining an international normalized ratio between 2 and 3. Whether patients with VTE and incomplete aPL profile can be treated with direct oral anticoagulants should be further investigated.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: Reversal of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin-induced activated protein C resistance.

BACKGROUND: Anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies are the major contributor to activated Protein C resistance (APC-R) in tetra-positive thrombotic high-risk patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of phospholipids (PL) on aPS/PT mediated APC-R. PATIENTS/METHODS: Total IgG were purified from plasma of 6 tetra-positive patients and IgG aPS/PT were affinity-purified from 3 of these patients. Purified material was spiked into Normal Pooled Plasma (NPP) and tested for APC-R in thrombin generation assay and in Factor Va inactivation assay using increasing amounts of phospholipids. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Total IgG showed APC-R at low PL concentration (1.5 µg/mL) that disappeared at increasing PL concentrations (5.8, 11.6 and 46.6 µg/mL). In the same way, affinity purified aPS/PT showed a robust (59 %, 52 %, 36 %) APC-R in patients #4, #5 and #6, respectively at low PL concentration (1.5 µg/mL) that was completely reversed at higher concentration (11.6 µg/mL). The inactivation of FVa by activated Protein C (aPC) was impaired in the presence of aPS/PT at low aPL concentration and reversed by increasing amounts of PL. These data point out the relevance of PL in reversing APC-R in this 'in vitro' system. The mechanism for reversal might be explained by loss of PL availability for aPC. These results may give some insight into the pathogenesis of thrombosis or suggestions for alternative treatments.

Platelet- and endothelial-derived microparticles in the context of different antiphospholipid antibody profiles.

OBJECTIVES: Studies on microparticles (MPs) in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are sparse and inconclusive. The relation between MPs and different aPL antibody profiles has never been tested. We evaluated the presence of platelet and endothelial microparticles in patients positive for IgG anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) antibodies according to triple, double and single positive aPL profiles. METHODS: Megamix (Biocytex) was used to set up the MPs gating according to the datasheet. Markers of Platelet Microparticles (PMPs) were CD41a-PE and annexin-V-FITC that was used to determine phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure. CD144-FITC was used as a marker of Endothelial Microparticles (EMPs). RESULTS: The number of total MPs and EMPs was significantly higher in triple positive groups with respect to single positive group and showed a significant correlation with IgG aß2GPI titers. The number PMPs was the lowest in triple positive group and inversely correlated with IgG aß2GPI titers. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated levels of total MPs and EMPs suggest a state of vascular activation in IgG aß2GPI positive individuals according to the number of positive tests. PMPs may be fast cleared from circulation in high risk triple positive patients.

Prevalence of aPhosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies and association with antiphospholipid antibody profiles in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and thrombotic events. The association of aPLs with thrombotic events depends on the number of positive tests. Besides the three classical tests to classify APS, phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex autoantibodies (aPS/PT) are increasingly used to better define this condition. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the prevalence of aPS/PT in general and according to antiphospholipid antibody profiles in patients with APS. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to September 2021 was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines. Proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects model. Publication biases were evaluated via visualization of funnel plots along with Egger's and Begg's tests. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles about the prevalence of aPS/PT in 1853 patients with APS were deemed eligible and analyzed according to the inclusion criteria. Pooled prevalence of aPS/PT IgG alone, IgM alone, and IgG/M were 50.0%, 45.0%, and 65.0%, respectively. No significant publication bias was detected from funnel plots or Egger's and Begg's tests. When the prevalence of aPS/PT was calculated in homogeneous aPLs, a much higher rate of pooled prevalence of aPS/PT IgG/M in patients positive for Lupus Anticoagulant (84.5%) and in those with triple positivity (83.4%) was found. CONCLUSIONS: These data show a high rate of aPS/PT positivity in patients with APS (especially in those positive for LAC) but further studies are needed to ascertain whether this test might be useful in the laboratory classification criteria of APS.

Impact of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination on high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a nationwide survey.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with APS and triple-positive for aPL are at high risk of recurrent events. As COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination may induce thrombotic complications, the objective of the study was to assess the course of COVID-19 and adverse events after vaccination in these patients. METHODS: This is a nationwide multicentre survey conducted in nine APS referral centres by means of a questionnaire. Included patients are thrombotic APS with triple-positive aPL confirmed 12 weeks apart. Reference specialist physicians used a four-graded scale of severity for COVID-19 [from 0 (asymptomatic) to 3 (hospitalization in intensive care unit)] and a six-graded scale for adverse reactions to vaccination [from 0 (transient local injection site sign/symptoms) to 5 (potentially life-threatening reactions)]. Outcomes were considered within a 30-day period. RESULTS: Out of 161 patients interviewed, 18 (11%) had COVID-19. All of them fully recovered without any progression to severe disease nor thromboembolic event. A total of 146 patients received the first (92%) and 129 (80%) the second dose of vaccine; side effects were minimal and, in most cases (83% after the first and 68% after the second vaccination) limited to a sore arm. Fifteen patients (9%) were unvaccinated. Most of them raised doubts on the need for vaccination, complained of poor safety and in general were reluctant about COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSION: Patients with triple-positive thrombotic APS did not suffer from severe COVID-19 outcomes. Importantly, COVID-19 vaccination was well tolerated. These data may reassure patients and physicians and contribute to reducing hesitancy in unvaccinated patients.

Gender Related Differences in Gastrointestinal Bleeding With Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: DOACs are characterized by a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and this may be different among males and females. Female patients were underrepresented in the DOAC pivotal trials. We aimed to assess real-world differences in gastrointestinal bleeding with oral anticoagulants (DOACs and VKAs) among males and females with atrial fibrillation. Methods: We performed a population-based retrospective analysis on linked administrative claims. Atrial fibrillation patients of 65 years and above were considered. Bleeding risk factors were assessed through HASBED and previous history of gastrointestinal disease. A time-to-event analysis compared gastrointestinal bleeding between males and females. Results: The overall cohort consisted of 15338 (55% female) DOAC and 44542 (50% female) VKA users. Most of the patients showed HASBED ≥2. Incidence rate of GI bleeding was higher in females as compared to males among DOAC users (0.90% vs 0.59%), and significant gender difference in GI bleeding was found, after adjustment, in the Cox regression analysis (HR 1.48, 95%CI 1.02-2.16). In the VKA group, no significant difference among genders was found in the time-to-event analysis. Conclusions: Our data suggest that female patients treated with DOACs have a higher risk of GI bleeding versus male patients; this difference is not observed in VKA patients.

Anti-phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) in isolated lupus anticoagulant (LA): is their presence linked to dual test positivity?

OBJECTIVES: Anti phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) are often present in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and might be relevant in the pathogenesis of this condition. They are major determinant of lupus anticoagulant (LA) in triple-positive antiphospholipid (aPL) profile. Whether they are present and pathogenic in patients with isolated LA [negative anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) antibodies] is a matter of debate. METHODS: We measured aPS/PT in a large number of isolated LA with the aim to ascertain whether there is a link between the way isolated LA is assessed and the presence of these antibodies. APS/PT were measured in 86 patients with isolated LA (aCL- and abeta2GPI-). LA was assessed by two test systems, the dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) and the Silica Clotting Time (SCT). RESULTS: Sixty-six (77%) individuals with isolated LA were positive for aPS/PT (IgM 44, IgG and IgM 15, IgG in 7). Diagnosis of LA was made based on positive results in both dRVVT and SCT in 40 patients (Group 1) and based on only one positive test in the remaining 46 patients (Group 2). The rate of positive aPS/PT antibodies was significantly higher in Group 1 (OR=7.2, 95% CI 1.9-27.0, p<0.002). Moreover, the titre of IgM aPS/PT was significantly increased in Group 1 as compared to Group 2 (137 U, IQR 64-179 vs. 43 U, IQR 11-120, p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate an association between LA based on two positive coagulation tests and the presence of aPS/PT antibodies, especially of IgM isotype.

Trial of Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome (TRAPS): Two-year outcomes after the study closure.

BACKGROUND: Trial of Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome was a prospective randomized, open-label, noninferiority study conducted in 14 centers in Italy. Rivaroxaban was compared with warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and vascular death in high-risk, triple-positive patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to report the events during the 2-year follow-up after the study closure. METHODS: On January 28, 2018, the trial was prematurely stopped by adjudication and safety committee for an excess of events in the rivaroxaban group. Randomized patients were advised on trial results and those randomized to rivaroxaban were solicited to switch to warfarin. All 14 participating centers were asked and accepted to follow their patients for clinical events. This report describes the rate of events that occurred between January 28, 2018, and January 28, 2020. RESULTS: Of 120 randomized patients, 115 were available for follow-up. Outcome events were two in six (33.3%) patients who remained on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and six in 109 (5.7%) patients on warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] 6.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-34.5, P = .018). The two patients on DOACs (one taking dabigatran and one taking rivaroxaban) suffered from thromboembolic events, whereas of the six patients with composite outcomes on warfarin, three had thromboembolic events (HR for thrombosis 13.3; 95% CI 2.2-79.9, P = .005). CONCLUSION: These data further support the use of warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Reduction in all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients on chronic oral anticoagulation: A population-based propensity score matched study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has strikingly high mortality rate with hypercoagulability state being part of the imputed mechanisms. We aimed to compare the rates of in hospital mortality in propensity score matched cohorts of COVID-19 patients in chronic anticoagulation versus those that were not. METHODS: In this population-based study in the Veneto Region, we retrospectively reviewed all patients aged 65 years or older, with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. We compared, after propensity score matching, those who received chronic anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation with those who did not. RESULTS: Overall, 4697 COVID-19 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria, and the propensity score matching yielded 559 patients per arm. All-cause mortality rate ratio was significantly higher among non-anticoagulated patients (32.2% vs 26.5%, p = 0.036). On time to event analysis, all-cause mortality was found lower among anticoagulated patients, although the estimate was not statistically significant. (HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.65-1.01, p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: Among elderly patients with COVID-19, those on chronic oral anticoagulant treatment for atrial fibrillation seem to be at lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to their propensity score matched non-anticoagulated counterpart. This finding needs to be confirmed in further studies.

General population screening for atrial fibrillation with an automated rhythm-detection blood pressure device.

BACKGROUND: Screening strategies to diagnose previously undetected atrial fibrillation (AF), especially silent AF (SAF), in at-risk populations may help reduce the number of strokes. We prospectively assessed the incidence rate of AF, including SAF, using an automated AF-detection capable sphygmomanometer in the General Practitioner (GP) setting. METHODS: This was a population-based prospective study of unselected general population of ≥65 years without prior AF. Participating GPs were requested, in the period February 2018-April 2019, to record all AF diagnoses including those derived from the AF-detection capable sphygmomanometer and confirmed by 12­lead ECG or ECG Holter in asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: Overall, 14,987 patients assisted by 76 GPs accumulated 16,838 patient-years of follow up. The incidence rate of AF was 2.25% patient-years (95%CI 2.03-2.48). AF was more frequently detected in male, older, overweight, and patients with prior stroke, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. One in four patients had device-detected SAF (0.56% patient-years, 95%CI 0.46-0.69). Age, overweight, and the number of annual visits, were independent predictors of both SAF and AF. In addition, congestive heart failure, mitral valve disease were independent predictors of AF. Due to the interaction between blood pressure and age the risk of AF increased exponentially after 75 years of age in patients with higher systolic blood pressure values. CONCLUSION: We found a higher than previously reported incidence rate of AF possibly by capturing SAF. Our simple protocol might be feasible in large-scale screening for AF and SAF in routine GP care.

Arterial thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS): Clinical approach and treatment. A systematic review.

Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is a condition affecting young individuals in whom a thromboembolic event occurs in the presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). An extensive body of literature has covered the most common clinical presentation of the syndrome, venous thromboembolism. Arterial thrombosis in APS, a lesser clinical expression, is less studied. This review will concentrate on the body of literature concerning pathogenesis, clinical presentation and management of arterial thrombosis in APS.

Insight into the hypercoagulable state of high-risk thrombotic APS patients: Contribution of aß2GPI and aPS/PT antibodies.

OBJECTIVE: Most high-risk thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients test positive for anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies. Information on the influence of these antibodies on thrombin generation and activated protein C resistance (aPCr) is still sparse and contradictory. METHODS: Plasma of 16 patients poured into a ß2GPI affinity column allowed the perfect separation of aß2GPI and aPS/PT antibodies. aPS/PT antibodies were further purified through a prothrombin affinity column. Obtained material was spiked into normal pooled plasma (NPP) and tested in the thrombin generation assay in the absence or presence of aPC. RESULTS: aPS/PT antibodies showed a marked anticoagulant effect. Affinity purified aPS/PT and aß2GPI antibodies from five patients were compared. aPS/PT antibodies showed significantly prolonged lag time and time to peak (5.0 minutes [interquartile range (IQR)3.5-6.1] versus 2.7 minutes [IQR2.2-3.5], P = .03 and 8.7 minutes [IQR6.7-10.3] versus 5.7 minutes [IQR4.5-6.2], P = .05, respectively) and significantly lower peak and velocity index (143 nmol/L [IQR131-163] versus 171 nmol/L [IQR157-182], P = .03 and 35 nmol/L/min [IQR32-59] versus 72 nmol/L/min [IQR54-77], P = .03, respectively). When aPC was added to the system, aPCr was significantly increased compared to controls for both aß2GPI and aPS/PT antibodies. However, it was significantly stronger using aPS/PT antibodies. Median inhibition of endogenous thrombin potential was 22% (IQR16-33) with aPS/PT compared to 52% (IQR46-56) with aß2GPI antibodies (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Aß2GPI antibodies show a mild anticoagulant and moderate procoagulant effect in thrombin generation and moderate aPC resistance. Conversely, aPS/PT antibodies show a strong anticoagulant effect and a strong aPCr.

Antibody profiles comprising anti phosphatidylserine/prothrombin differently affect thrombin generation and protein C resistance in antiphospholipid antibody carriers.

Anti phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) are currently not included in the laboratory work-up of antiphospholipid symdrome (APS). However, several studies indicate that aPS/PT confer additional risk for thromboembolic events when added to classical antiphospholipid (aPL) antibody panel. We aimed to study thrombin generation (TG), a test that describes hyper or hypo-coagulability, in a cohort of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) carriers with or without aPS/PT. As oral anticoagulants interfere with TG, we performed the study in carriers of aPL antibodies not on oral anticoagulants treatment. TG in tissue factor-triggered platelet-poor plasma and its inhibition by thrombomodulin was measured with a calibrated automated thrombogram method. Data are expressed as minutes (Interquartile Range). Of 55 aPL carriers, 37 were positive and 18 were negative for aPS/PT. Lag Time 5.4 min (4.1; 7.3) vs 3.4 min (3.0;4.5) is significant longer (p < 0.0001) and time to peak 9.6 min (8.1;11) vs 7.7 min (6.8;8.8) is significantly delayed (p = 0.0011) in aPS/PT positive as compared to aPS/PT negative carriers. Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP), peak thrombin formation and the velocity index are lower in aPS/PT positive carriers but did not reach statistical significance. Inhibition of ETP by thrombomodulin was significantly lower (protein C resistance) in aPS/PT positive vs aPS/PT negative group (22.8%±11.5 vs 34.9%±20.4, p = 0.01). In conclusion, aPS/PT positive carriers show an anticoagulant effect in TG while they exert a procoagulant effect in response to thrombomodulin-activated protein C.

Benefit of dual antithrombotic therapy with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials.

Antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is still debated. We conducted a meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials to evaluate the benefit of different antithrombotic strategies. Data were analyzed between May and September 2019. Efficacy outcomes were trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); its individual components; stent thrombosis. Safety outcomes were trial-defined primary bleeding outcome; TIMI and ISTH major bleeding; clinically relevant non-major bleeding; intracranial hemorrhage. Differences in outcomes among groups were expressed as pooled odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Four randomized studies were included (10,969 patients). The mean age ranged from 69 to 72 years, prevalence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) varied from 48 to 62%. Comparing dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) with vitamin K antagonist (VKA), OR for trial-defined MACE and primary bleeding outcome were 1.03 (95% CI, 0.86-1.24) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.41-0.86), respectively. There was a 68% lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and a non-statistically significant higher risk of stent thrombosis with DAT. DAT was as effective and safer than TAT in patients with stable coronary artery disease, while a trend towards increased ischemic events was seen in ACS patients. DAT with a DOAC showed similar efficacy and less bleeding than TAT with a VKA. However, increased stent thrombosis with DAT may be present, and TAT should be considered in patients at high ischemic risk, such as ACS patients.

Death rates and causes in anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients: a population-based study.

AIMS: To compare mortality between anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients and general population and among anticoagulation specific categories [direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. vitamin K antagonists(VKA)]. METHODS: This was a population-based study including all residents in the Veneto Region aged 18 years or older. Administrative claims from July 2013 to September 2017 were used to identify anticoagulation-naïve atrial fibrillation patients. Propensity score matching was employed to compare patients on new and old anticoagulants. RESULTS: Overall, 17 225 patients on direct anticoagulants were 1 : 1 matched to patients on VKA (49% males, median age 77 years). Mortality was higher with respect to the general population by 22 and 39% among patients on direct anticoagulants and VKA, respectively. Mortality from intracranial hemorrhage in the direct anticoagulant group was similar to that in the general population [standardized mortality ratio: 1.06, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.76-1.48], whereas it almost doubled in VKA group (1.92, 95% CI 1.49-2.46). When directly compared with the VKA cohort, the risk of death from intracranial hemorrhage halved with DOACs (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.84). CONCLUSION: The mortality rate of anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients is increased with respect to the general population, particularly among patients treated with VKAs. The mortality rate for intracranial bleeding with DOACs is similar to that observed in the general population.